Go Back   AstinaGT Forums > Performance & Technical > Suspension & Wheels

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 30-09-2004, 07:54 PM   #101
platypus
living in the past man
 
platypus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Newcastle, NSW
Car: Subaru Outback 2.0 turbo
Posts: 4,707
Send a message via MSN to platypus
hmm i'll get back to you on all gb's... just call me boyd....
__________________
1997 BG5 Subaru Outback - Now with STI boost...
platypus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2004, 09:41 AM   #102
twilightprotege
Driving a faster car now!
 
twilightprotege's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Work, always at bloody work...
Car: Lotus ....... .
Posts: 5,217
hey arden i cant find it, but how many did we have to get in a GB to get a discount?
twilightprotege is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2004, 10:35 AM   #103
arden
Senior Member
 
arden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sydney
Car: Suby
Posts: 1,280
Alright,
right now, not that happy.
came out of Whiteline with back tyre flat.
they rang me up soon after sayin they noticed it flat as i was drving off. Of course i was thankful.
pumped it up at servo....it was completely flat...5psi. so drove to work...tyre looks decent.
but i hear a small leak.....so im screwed. Gonna take it to bob jane for patch up.

ok onto the swaybars.

Another BITCH i have...THEY USE THE SAME EXISTING REAR SWAYBAR!!!!!!got charged like full price!
DAMN DAMN DAMN.

Front bar is 24mm. $180 full price. So u guys are lucky there.
So not much point in organising group buy, which they need 10 ppl and will take 10% off.

Results: Bit hard to tell when its pissing down...but body roll is reduced dramatically.
Goes into corners leaner and meaner.
arden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2004, 10:44 AM   #104
chipa
Crazy Member
 
chipa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Sydney
Car: FPV F6 Typhoon
Posts: 1,372
Does anyone know how hard these are to install in our cars?
__________________
King Spring Lows, TWM short shifter, split eardrums, blah blah blah and a little voice saying "I wish I had a turbo"

Updated 2007-03-19: Readers Rides Finally upgraded from the stock headunit
chipa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2004, 10:47 AM   #105
arden
Senior Member
 
arden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sydney
Car: Suby
Posts: 1,280
guy was tellin me its a pain to install.
as front control arm has to be taken off.
__________________
arden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2004, 10:54 AM   #106
chipa
Crazy Member
 
chipa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Sydney
Car: FPV F6 Typhoon
Posts: 1,372
doh! Thats what I afraid of. Doesn't sound like the front is something I would tackle myself. Probably do the back and then pay someone to do the front for me.
__________________
King Spring Lows, TWM short shifter, split eardrums, blah blah blah and a little voice saying "I wish I had a turbo"

Updated 2007-03-19: Readers Rides Finally upgraded from the stock headunit
chipa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2004, 12:05 PM   #107
twilightprotege
Driving a faster car now!
 
twilightprotege's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Work, always at bloody work...
Car: Lotus ....... .
Posts: 5,217
what what what?

same rear bar? wtf?

those farkers!

they reckoned that the rear bar was matched to the stock front bar, but then they make the front bar bigger and the rear is matched to it? wtf?

arden what's that tossers email address - i have a few words to say!

ps - damn screws!
twilightprotege is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2004, 01:24 PM   #108
arden
Senior Member
 
arden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sydney
Car: Suby
Posts: 1,280
yeh my thoughts exactly. Doesnt make sense.

wojtek@whiteline.com.au

flame away.
__________________
arden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2004, 01:40 PM   #109
SFC01
Junior Member
 
SFC01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Mordialloc, VIC
Posts: 167
You had the stock rear bar on when it was delivered and they didn't change it?

If they have gone stiffer on the front without lifting the rate of the back all they have done is hamper your cornering ability.

Just before we get carried away what other suspension mods have you got? The possibility EXISTS that for your springs only increasing the front MAY have been beneficial. I am in no way condoning their course of action so don't flame me.

Personally I would say that by increasing the front bar rate it would follow that the rear bar rate should be increased in proportion over that of the stiffest BFR59Z setting. That would be my take on it.

Arden I am disappointed firstly that you have been charged anything for them to develop a product which may well sell like hotcakes. To me that is shocking business sense.
__________________
SFC01
2003 BJII Astina
Rampod/CAI, Adjustable Rear ARB, Strut Brace, slotted rotors RB156 pads, TWM Short Shifter + Kartboy shifter bushings
SFC01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2004, 01:46 PM   #110
arden
Senior Member
 
arden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sydney
Car: Suby
Posts: 1,280
They used the current whiteline rear swaybar...the bfr59z.
Suspension mods, are Kings Low Springs.

Im a bit shocked they charged me so much for it.

the guy there made a huge deal how much i saved on labour.
and i got like 30 bucks off the new front sway bar. like WOW.
:roll:
__________________
arden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2004, 01:51 PM   #111
arden
Senior Member
 
arden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sydney
Car: Suby
Posts: 1,280
oh, wot is stock size on rear bar???
forgot to mention they set it at 20mm, not the max 22mm setting.
__________________
arden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2004, 02:01 PM   #112
arden
Senior Member
 
arden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sydney
Car: Suby
Posts: 1,280
Andrews, found Pete's famous words

"The existing range of rear bars are designed to match and balance the OEM front bar. Fitting a larger front bar will require a new rear bar and we would therefore design new rear bars to match and rebalance the chassis etc. "
__________________
arden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2004, 02:16 PM   #113
SFC01
Junior Member
 
SFC01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Mordialloc, VIC
Posts: 167
The larger front bar + bfr59z will be a huge increase over stock. What may not have changed is the understeer/oversteer balance of the chassis.

I don't find the stock 1.8 front bar + stiffer BFR59z setting overly tail happy on dry bitumen. It may not be optimal for everyone though. The rear is well and truly willing to come around on dirt.

So you have uprated front AND rear bars. That wasn't so evident from your first post. You should still find some room for adjustment if they've left it at the softer setting.

Were you provided with any traction circle/skidpan data to compare OEM to your setting? If not I'd be pushing to get some of that info so you can see quantitatively what difference there is on your car.
__________________
SFC01
2003 BJII Astina
Rampod/CAI, Adjustable Rear ARB, Strut Brace, slotted rotors RB156 pads, TWM Short Shifter + Kartboy shifter bushings
SFC01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2004, 02:17 PM   #114
twilightprotege
Driving a faster car now!
 
twilightprotege's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Work, always at bloody work...
Car: Lotus ....... .
Posts: 5,217
do you have pete's email addy? i'll email them both and see what the hell they are on
twilightprotege is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2004, 02:21 PM   #115
arden
Senior Member
 
arden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sydney
Car: Suby
Posts: 1,280
Scot,

i was provided with a tax invoice and wheel alignment settings.
i will ask for the other data u mentioned.
__________________
arden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2004, 02:21 PM   #116
arden
Senior Member
 
arden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sydney
Car: Suby
Posts: 1,280
peter@whiteline.com.au
__________________
arden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2004, 02:33 PM   #117
twilightprotege
Driving a faster car now!
 
twilightprotege's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Work, always at bloody work...
Car: Lotus ....... .
Posts: 5,217
arden you swapped back to the original bar before taking there right?
twilightprotege is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2004, 02:40 PM   #118
arden
Senior Member
 
arden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sydney
Car: Suby
Posts: 1,280
switched?
was stock all the way...apart from springs
__________________
arden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2004, 07:22 PM   #119
ezin
AstinaGT Regular
 
ezin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: melb
Posts: 416
Considering the mazdaspeed protege has F=25mm and R=20 I would say they have set it up with a neutral setting which is good! Neutral is good so dont be to quick to flame the guys at whitline. Even if its got the same bfr59z bar on the back, are u happy with the way ur car handles around conners cause thats all that matters, U still got two bars (1 designed) and a 4WA (which is a prick on a lowered sp cause the lazers get blocked and u have to remove all the plastic covers under the engine) I think U got a good deal.
ezin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2004, 07:48 PM   #120
twilightprotege
Driving a faster car now!
 
twilightprotege's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Work, always at bloody work...
Car: Lotus ....... .
Posts: 5,217
original email i sent to peter and wojtek, reply and it's reply to follow :

Hi Peter and Wotjek,

I just had word from Arden Wong that he has his yellow Mazda Astina SP20 back with the new sway bars. However, I think there is a problem.

Originally Peter you said that the current rear bar available (bfr59z) was matched to the stock front bar, however when the new front bar was made (24mm - a 2mm increase over stock), the current available rear bar was used. That makes no sense from your original statement.

To quote, you said "The existing range of rear bars are designed to match and balance the OEM front bar. Fitting a larger front bar will require a new rear bar and we would therefore design new rear bars to match and rebalance the chassis
etc."

So what went wrong or what happened? I would have thought the front bar would have gone to 25 or 26mm, and then a rear bar made to suit, 21 or 22mm.

So could you shed some light on the situation? I'm quite disappointed with the outcome of this exercise. I feel bad because I asked Arden to do our small Astina community a favour and donate his car for a few days. Arden already had the bfr59z rear sway bar. He sold it so he could change back to the stock rear bar so you could do a complete comparison and upgrade.

In addition, what were done with the mounts?
twilightprotege is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
bg sway bar removal 89sp1.8 Suspension & Wheels 2 11-01-2007 03:53 PM
Sway Bar Plutonus Suspension & Wheels 11 09-07-2006 12:14 PM
possible GB sway bar and strut brace BG mazdamanik Suspension & Wheels 8 10-08-2005 04:34 PM
Quarter Mile times skippy General Automotive Talk 7 08-01-2005 04:49 AM
Bugger. Need new shocks and sway bar links :( Red Frog Suspension & Wheels 15 07-07-2004 10:57 AM


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 03:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
2001- 2010 AstinaGT