Go Back   AstinaGT Forums > AstinaGT Talk > General Automotive Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15-08-2012, 02:02 PM   #261
70NYD
Veni, vidi, vici
 
70NYD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Brisbane
Car: 1996 BA Hatch & 2005 RX8
Posts: 4,911
I was under impressed with the car when i saw it I must say, 3 years of looking at concepts must have ****ed with my judgement (that and the ride/ top end acceleration of my 8)
Apparently subi aust applied for a compliance of a rwd turbo!
But we shall see
There are quite a few bugs to work out, like squeaks, noises, some cars not having tranny fluid from factory, some cars pinging from new etc
Overall still great car
It doesn't need a turbo really, it handles great and goes alright from stock, but for those wanting more pull, it's a great, cheap option, and it still handles great and not like a land boat and is light
__________________

Last edited by 70NYD; 15-08-2012 at 02:06 PM.
70NYD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-08-2012, 04:53 PM   #262
BG1.8sp
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sydney
Car: 2009 BL MPS
Posts: 2,300
Lol, that's a bit of an extensive set up. E85, 850cc injectors, full standalone ecu, with a 2871 strapped to the side of it. That set up is a waste without the forgies to back that up. Turbo is wayyyyyyyy out of its efficiency range. And huge lag for that power (watched the vid)
__________________
BG1.8sp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-08-2012, 06:12 PM   #263
Ice88
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Auchenflower, Brisbane
Car: Blue SP20
Posts: 2,782
Quote:
Originally Posted by BG1.8sp View Post
Lol, that's a bit of an extensive set up. E85, 850cc injectors, full standalone ecu, with a 2871 strapped to the side of it. That set up is a waste without the forgies to back that up. Turbo is wayyyyyyyy out of its efficiency range. And huge lag for that power (watched the vid)
How do you get that? And considering some of the builds that go on that's next to nothing. The block has yet to be opened, cams are yet to be changed. Everything's been external so far.

And what do you mean by outside of its efficiency range?
__________________
Ice88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-08-2012, 06:28 PM   #264
BG1.8sp
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sydney
Car: 2009 BL MPS
Posts: 2,300
Not saying its like ridiculously expensive... But just saying its bit of poor choice of parts... Guess it looks better on paper. Block yet to be opened... Cams yet to be changed... No beadwork what so ever...
Running a 2871 (didn't look see what the trim was) but that turbo should be running on 16-21psi ish Mabey up to 23 depending on trim (48 to 56)

Turbos are one million times more responsive when pushed hard into its eff. Range.

Link

For that power and that low boost, and it's running on E85... And has high comp NA internals It is stupidly laggy. Yes running a 2871 over a t28 on the same boost will get you a bit more power... But makes it much more laggy.
On 9psi that's well withing the range of a T25.
Put it this way... Look at the Evo... Basically 2871 sized turbo... Runs 18-21 psi stock. (spikes at 21 and slowly droops off)
And you now have an engine that comes on cam miles before the turbo comes into efficiency.

Run at most a T28 on 9psi with stock cams. Make pretty much the same power probably 10kw less, have a nicer torque curve. Much sooner power an nicer to drive.
__________________
BG1.8sp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-08-2012, 08:59 AM   #265
Ice88
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Auchenflower, Brisbane
Car: Blue SP20
Posts: 2,782
Ahhh you where talking bout the turbo. Thought you where talking about the engine and was like huh?
__________________
Ice88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-08-2012, 12:13 PM   #266
TheMAN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: USA
Car: .
Posts: 2,623
who cares? that car is still bloody fast!
and I think they're still working on making it even faster!
__________________
Protege FAQ, the best 323/Protege/Mazda3 resource enjoyed worldwide for 10 years
TheMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-08-2012, 03:32 PM   #267
Ice88
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Auchenflower, Brisbane
Car: Blue SP20
Posts: 2,782
Having revisited the site, I think they choose that turbo to as it gives them room to grow.

For instance they started off at 4psi. Remember this engine is largely untested, we do not know how strong the rods/pistons are or how well the open deck design will cope with boost etc.
__________________
Ice88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-08-2012, 04:54 PM   #268
BG1.8sp
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sydney
Car: 2009 BL MPS
Posts: 2,300
Well they ain't going to go to like 23psi lol
That's why I said T28 (or T28 sized) would have been nicer. Still good for up to 18psi

Anyways... Will be nice to see it Pop and at what point
__________________
BG1.8sp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-08-2012, 10:29 PM   #269
rodhog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sydney Lakemba
Car: mx-6 626 Gs300 Maz2 was 95 KF BA-HT
Posts: 2,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by BG1.8sp View Post
Anyways... Will be nice to see it Pop and at what point

well how can I say this (it's unoffical)
but being sick last few days made a some phone calls. catch up

A well known Sydney workshop apparently well how do I say this
One blew up a Jap engine from some nissan ? can't remember much.Other then is was big ?
but toward the end of it all, I was informed two things - 1 - was I interested in a 2JZ bottom end - answer - Not yet. 2nd Said workshop - who has in the past built many many many many WRX Drag cars.
Has 86 and a 86 engine and been working on turbo - nitrous - Yes NOS.
I understand it's for US market.
Big thing they said - Still won't rev hard. Rods are strong so far bent not broken- pistons ain't ? cracked land is what he said. But 25PSI so ?

So expect to see it out at WSID - is my understanding soon. Being RWD it makes sense to me.
rodhog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-10-2012, 07:07 PM   #270
Orion
SP20 Member!
 
Orion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Brisbane
Car: Mazda SP20 sedan
Posts: 1,769
Saw a black Subaru version today in Milton.

On first impressions, the Subaru front was more appealing than the Toyota
__________________

Exhaust: Autoexe headers; Custom midpipe; Racing Beat catback
Engine: AWR mounts; Twiggy cams; Custom CAI; RR Racing UDP; Mishimoto rad
EMS: Microtech LT-10; J&S Safeguard;
Gearbox: MSP LSD; Fidanza flywheel; 5th gear
Rims/Suspension: MX-5 rims; Tokico Illuminas; Eibach Pro-kit; Progress RSB; AutoExe STB
Exterior: MSP front lip & rear spoiler; Matt V headlights; AutoExe grill; EDM tails
Interior: JVC AVX-77; Autometer gauges; DaveBs; B&M shifter
Projects to come: Engine rebuild
Orion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-10-2012, 07:49 PM   #271
Hammo
Senior Member
 
Hammo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Brisbane, QLd
Car: 03 Sp20
Posts: 854
I also seen a black one fresh off a truck just sitting for the new owner to pick it up at charlestown toyota, mind you when i seen it i was in a ML 63
Hammo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-10-2012, 05:08 PM   #272
Ice88
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Auchenflower, Brisbane
Car: Blue SP20
Posts: 2,782
http://www.caradvice.com.au/196513/s...-tempt-buyers/

STi version, honestly hope they keep it NA. Love one, otherwise ill be forced to get an BRZ and get a kit on top
__________________
Ice88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 04:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
2001- 2010 AstinaGT